Search for: "Newman v State of New York" Results 221 - 240 of 255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2010, 4:08 am
Quid pro quo in the nature of the withdrawal of disciplinary charges not required to validate disciplinary settlement agreementMatter of Newman v Fire Dept. of the City of New York, 47 A.D.3d 444Joseph P. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:26 am by Susan Brenner
Supreme Court’s decision in New York v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:35 am by Adam Chandler
Lyle Denniston reports for SCOTUSblog that both parties in New Process Steel v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:27 am by Stuart Blake
In-house counsel should be aware of the new corporate sustainability requirements and recommendations to advise organizations how to develop policies, avoid liability and succeed in the new green economy. [read post]
Professor Dreyfuss, the Pauline Newman Professor of Law at New York University School of Law and a Codirector of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law and Policy at NYU, serves on the U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 1:29 pm
Shortly after agreeing to supply Sunbeam, Pentalpha obtained a "right-to-use study" from an attorney in Binghamton, New York. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
John's University School of Law and New York Law School, commented: "... [read post]
21 May 2009, 11:44 am
  Judge Newman joined the opinion but wrote separately to voice his disquiet over the fact that the defendant had been arrested by the local police but was prosecuted in federal court because New York courts would have suppressed the evidence as a matter of state law had he been prosecuted locally. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 12:14 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITFamily LawFree With Registration: State Challenge to Foster Care Reimbursement Refusal Misconstrued Law, 'Reasonable Efforts' State of New York, plaintiff-appellant v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:27 am
Oct. 15, 2008), a unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the summary judgment granted to Bayer by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, holding that Bayer’s settlement of patent litigation with a generic pharmaceutical manufacturer did not violate the antitrust laws. [read post]