Search for: "Ovalle v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2022, 6:07 am
For all the political tumult demanding – and exhausting – the attention of Americans – the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
Lavishing money on the businesses of the man who sits in the Oval emits a decidedly unpleasant odor, but is it bribery? [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 3:56 am
It overruled Roe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:12 pm
But the Court has never established a flat rule that such communications are per se privileged -- after all, Nixon had to turn over his tapes of Oval Office conversations -- or that close advisors can never be compelled to testify. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 2:59 pm
The ruling, RDK Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 3:47 am
In Bostock v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926). [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
And all of this is simply a precursor to the repeal of Roe v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
To state the obvious, no emergency exists. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:21 am
Haldeman v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 2:20 pm
Later that afternoon, the President cleared the Oval Office to have a one-on-one meeting with Comey. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:45 am
” Similarly, while president, Thomas Jefferson responded to a House resolution requesting information about the conspiracy against the United States involving Aaron Burr by providing all information relevant to Burr but withholding other names. [read post]
A Presidential Proclamation to End the Iraq War: Unilateral Executive Action to Defang a Zombie AUMF
20 Aug 2024, 6:05 am
The Resolution provides that the: President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to— (1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Trump had refused to criticize Russia on the campaign trail, praising President Vladimir V. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
[About the same as other rifles] Several federal and state courts are relitigating the constitutionality of "assault weapon" bans after the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 11:23 am
Trump’s Ellipse Speech incited the violence at the Capitol on January 6 and could satisfy the Supreme Court’s standard for ‘incitement’ under Brandenburg v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:49 pm
Cohen stated on the audio that he had spoken to Weisselberg about setting up a shell company to reimburse AMI—indicating that Trump was aware of the arrangements. [read post]
