Search for: "PATEL v. PATEL"
Results 221 - 240
of 807
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2013, 11:32 am
Note: The jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus was a core issue of Marbury v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 4:24 pm
Judgment for Specific Performance Reversed Because Dispute About Time and Manner of Payment Prevented the Court From Applying the Rule of Reasonable Time and MannerPatel v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:54 am
Patel v. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 9:26 am
It does this by applying Jacobson v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 11:22 am
In Patel v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 4:42 am
Justice Barrett wrote for the Court in Patel v. [read post]
19 Dec 2024, 5:40 am
International Refugee Assistance Project and Trump v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 7:11 pm
Hamilton v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 2:12 pm
Angel Diaz In City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 8:06 am
In their examinations of furnishers, the CFPB examiners found “CMS weaknesses and numerous violations of the FCRA and Regulation V that required corrective action by furnisher(s). [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 9:29 am
In Patel v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 2:48 am
This is a follow-up to my previous post on this topic: "No, the Epic v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 12:49 am
Last month, the Supreme Court comprehensively dealt with the Arbitrability question in Booz Allen & Hamilton v SBI Home Finance and laid down general principles on Arbitrability. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:54 pm
They quoted Sibron v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:25 am
The controlled substances involved included the Schedule II drug OxyContin, the Schedule III drug Vicodin, the Schedule IV drug Xanax, and the Schedule V drug cough syrup with codeine. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:12 pm
., Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 11:49 am
One of EFF's first major legal victories was Bernstein v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:06 am
Patel, No. 13-1175. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:51 am
This week, a three-judge panel sitting on the Ninth Circuit in Patel v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 2:00 am
It held that the Supreme Court decision of Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42, in which a more flexible approach to the illegality doctrine was recently adopted in a contractual context, did not apply to this sort of case. [read post]
