Search for: "PROPERTIES FOUR, INC. v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,988
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 3:48 am
Today’s second argument is in New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 9:34 am
On Friday, at the ABA Annual Meeting in San Francisco, the Section of State and Local Government Law along with the Section of Real Property, Probate, and Trust Law co-sponsored a panel discussion of what was the most fascinating case of the Supreme Court's recently-concluded term, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 4:22 pm
See Main Drug, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:08 pm
At least a couple of district judges seem to understand that: see Del-Prairie Stock Farm, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 7:08 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 4:47 pm
His Honour stated: “At first glance, it therefore appears [under s106B(2) and s80(1)] that the Court could very well have the power to make the order charging the husband’s mother’s property if the Court is satisfied after a trial of the orders sought pursuant to s106B should be made and that the husband’s mother should be ordered to repay the money directly to the wife rather than the… [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:31 pm
From O'Handley v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm
Motel Enters., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 6:06 am
Phusion Projects Inc. manufactures and distributes the alcoholic beverage Four Loko. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 1:36 pm
Smith Logging Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 3:00 am
Vogle v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 10:49 am
FAS Technologies, Inc. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 4:27 am
$2,000,000 in March 2008 for a young girl in a Bronx apartment (Guttierrez v. 824 South East Boulevard Realty, Inc.; Index # 15630/94) $4,650,000 in October 2007 for a four year old boy in Brooklyn (Perez v. 2246 Holding Corp.; Index # 1683/04) $3,500,000 in March 2007 for a young girl in a Brooklyn apartment (Bernardez v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:15 am
States. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 8:06 am
STATE OF NEW YORK v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:25 am
The four-count complaint asserts causes of action for breach of implied contract, account stated, quantum meruit, and unjust enrichment. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:12 pm
Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 8:14 am
Copps Chappel held the only way a fee simple determinable could be created was to include language explicitly stating that the property would revert to the grantor upon the happening of a stated event. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 pm
Waxman offered four reasons. [read post]
