Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 6,157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2013, 12:50 pm by Wells Bennett
What, if anything, do developments in the military commission case of United States v. al-Nashiri portend for Al-Nashiri v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am by Daniel West
Concluding on the basis of previous authorities that ‘attributability’ had been interpreted as requiring a ‘real possibility of a causal link’ (para 35), Lord Walker expressed the view that it was therefore a legal impossibility for a claimant to lack knowledge of attributability once the claim had been issued, given that the claim form contained a statement of truth which stated as much (see also per Lord Wilson at para 3). [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am by Daniel West
Concluding on the basis of previous authorities that ‘attributability’ had been interpreted as requiring a ‘real possibility of a causal link’ (para 35), Lord Walker expressed the view that it was therefore a legal impossibility for a claimant to lack knowledge of attributability once the claim had been issued, given that the claim form contained a statement of truth which stated as much (see also per Lord Wilson at para 3). [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:49 am by Adam Baker
The majority stated simply that “[t]here is no reason why the parties would expect an owner would investigate whether a bidder will comply, when each bidder is legally obliged to comply in the event its bid is accepted” (para 51). [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 2:05 pm by Jordan Bierkos
When Razar was awarded the contract, Evoqua simply issued a purchase order that stated that the terms and conditions of purchase that was located on its website applied to the purchase order unless otherwise agreed to in writing; Evoqua also provided a link to the website.[2]Ibid, at para. 6. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:36 am by Kay Marbiah
  [1] Bloomberg LP v ZXC, [2022] UKSC 5, available here: https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2020-0122-judgment.pdf [2] Judgment, para 13 [3] Judgment, para 18 [4] Judgment, para 21 [5] Judgment, para 67 [6] Judgment, para 50 [7] Judgment, para 81 [8] Judgment, para 108 [9] Judgment, para 111 [10] Judgment, para 116 [11] Judgment, para 121 [12] Judgment, para 142 [13] Judgment,… [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Lisa Salazar
Specifically K-V wants a ban on the importation of all 17 HPC “except as authorized by [K-V]” and to prevent the sale or solicitation of 17 HPC within the United States from any imported source unless authorized by K-V. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 2:35 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Secretary of State appealed the decision to the Upper Tribunal and was allowed the appeal in respect of the definition of adoption in para 352D. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am by Frank Cranmer
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:10 am by Rachel A. Howie
”17 Specifically, whether norms recognized by customary international law can ground new private law causes of action in Canada before Canadian courts. 1 Factum of the Appellant Nevsun Resources Ltd. at para 21.2 Araya v Nevsun Resources Ltd., 2017 BCCA 401 at para 4 [Appeal].3 Ibid at para 2.4 Araya v Nevsun Resources Ltd., 2016 BCSC 1856 at para 33.5 Ibid at paras 33-36. 6 Ibid at para 26. 7 Ibid at… [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:10 am by Rachel A. Howie
”17 Specifically, whether norms recognized by customary international law can ground new private law causes of action in Canada before Canadian courts. 1 Factum of the Appellant Nevsun Resources Ltd. at para 21.2 Araya v Nevsun Resources Ltd., 2017 BCCA 401 at para 4 [Appeal].3 Ibid at para 2.4 Araya v Nevsun Resources Ltd., 2016 BCSC 1856 at para 33.5 Ibid at paras 33-36. 6 Ibid at para 26. 7 Ibid at… [read post]