Search for: "Patterson v. Does" Results 221 - 240 of 536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2015, 8:28 am by Ralph L. Jacobson
The court found that the plaintiff did not consent to, or agree to excuse, a landing strip owner’s breach of its duty to design and maintain a safe airstrip, so the doctrine did not apply.In Patterson v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:46 am by Joy Waltemath
Disputing this conclusion, McDonalds posed the question: How can uniforms, logos, and food packaging support ostensible agency, when, without more, they are insufficient to find “true agency,” as the California Supreme Court recognized in Patterson v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:45 am
In Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98 the Court of Appeals said that including charges concerning performance that were addressed in a counseling memorandum was not “double jeopardy. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 5:14 am
Let's take another look at yesterday's defense motion in USA v. [read post]