Search for: "Pearce"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,231
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
In the case of Pearce v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 1:10 pm
Mural in arched panel by Charles Sprague Pearce. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:17 am
Here are some of my favorite headlines/highlights of the season: * The Red Sox Will Probably Never Lose Again, Unless It’s Out Of Sympathy (2018-08-08)http://www.survivinggrady.com/2018/04/red-sox-will-probably-never-lose-unless-sympathy.html * Betts Hits Slam, Red Sox Rout Yanks 14-1 For 9th Win In Row (2018-04-11)https://sports.yahoo.com/betts-hits-slam-red-sox-rout-yanks-14-025011981–mlb.html * Don’t Want To Overstate This, But The Boston Red Sox Are Currently The Greatest Thing… [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
By Joy P. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 9:13 am
Pearce was appointed to the Board in 2010 by then-President Barack Obama for a partial term. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 6:25 am
As for what another Pearce term would mean to employers, Fishman says Pearce can be expected to vote much like any other Democrat nominee. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 6:25 am
As for what another Pearce term would mean to employers, Fishman says Pearce can be expected to vote much like any other Democrat nominee. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 11:35 am
” Member Pearce Dissents [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 12:55 pm
President Trump is reportedly being urged to compromise with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and reappoint National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) member Mark Pearce, a Democrat whose term ends Monday, to another five-year session. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
In case you missed the in-depth coverage of Employment Law Daily for July, here’s a recap of some key developments in the L&E community. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:18 pm
No word on a replacement for Pearce. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:22 am
Members Mark Gaston Pearce and Lauren McFerran, the Democrats on the Board, dissented. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:22 am
Members Mark Gaston Pearce and Lauren McFerran, the Democrats on the Board, dissented. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 11:52 am
Democratic Board Members Pearce and McFerran each filed a sharp dissent criticizing the majority’s decision to revisit Purple Communications, both arguing that the decision in Purple Communications was carefully considered, there has been no change that warrants its overruling, and nothing should be done while the appeal of the Board’s decision in Purple Communications remains pending before the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:32 am
Board Members Pearce (who was in the Purple Communications majority) and McFerran dissented from the decision to solicit briefs. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
NLRB Chairman John Ring and NLRB members Marvin Kaplan and William Emanuel issued the Notice and Invitation to File Briefs over the dissent of the other two Board members, Mark Gaston Pearce and Lauren McFerran. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 7:40 am
“An obscure federal law may give corporations immunity from lawsuits over terrorism”: Matt Pearce of The Los Angeles Times has an article that begins, “For MGM Resorts International, millions of dollars could hinge on a single question: Was the shooting massacre of 58 people at a concert in Las Vegas last year an act of terrorism? [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 2:18 am
The Court held that the Court of Appeal should have considered the impact of the original capital payment on the wife’s current need to pay rent, and this involved a consideration of three earlier Court of Appeal authorities: Pearce v Pearce [2003] EWCA Civ 1054, North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760, and Yates v Yates [2012] EWCA Civ 532. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am
In case you missed Employment Law Daily’s in-depth coverage, here’s a recap of just some of the key developments in the L&E community for June 2018. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:59 am
Divided Board Concludes Employee’s Statement Was a Weingarten Request for Representation On appeal, a two member majority (Pearce and McFerran) of the Board agreed with the Administrative Law Judge that the employee’s statement was tantamount to a request for representation noting: Board law is clear that ‘[n]o magic or special words are required [to trigger a Weingarten request]…It is enough if the language used by the employee is reasonably calculated to apprise… [read post]
