Search for: "People v. Gaines (1980)"
Results 221 - 240
of 287
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2020, 11:40 pm
In the 1980s, I thought that the toxicity of Agent Orange was exaggerated, but now that the theocons have dropped this weaponized Russian Agent Orange on the White House, I see that I was wrong. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
Until the mid-1980s, she writes, the Federal Communications Commission regulated media ownership and “broadcasters were held to a standard of public trusteeship, in which the right to use the airwaves came with a mandate to provide for democratic discourse. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 10:07 am
United States (1980). [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:02 pm
The petition relies on the 1980′s decision in Harper and Row v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
”[28] V. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm
Back when I was a summer associate at White & Case, we used to talk about SEC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
But Dinan focuses on something even more important about most of the states: With only one exception (Delaware), they reject what Madison was so proud of in Federalist 63, i.e., the removal from “we the people” of even an iota of an ability to engage in direct governance. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:14 pm
AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF THE NETWORK FOR INVESTOR ACTION AND PROTECTION STATEMENT The Network For Investor Action And Protection (“NIAP”) is a two year old organization with about 1,200 members which arose because of the Madoff debacle and seeks to protect against frauds that victimize investors. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 6:01 am
The central part of the 117-page opinion, captioned Texas v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm
The Occupy Movement first gained national attention on September 17, 2011, when a group of protesters moved into Zuccotti Park in New York City, calling themselves Occupy Wall Street. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
Molina v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
Civiletti, 629 F.2d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 1980). [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
For sex-related speech, the Supreme Court finally abandoned the test in 1957 in Roth v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
For sex-related speech, the Supreme Court finally abandoned the test in 1957 in Roth v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 6:14 am
Schedule V The substances on this schedule have a low potential for abuse and usually consist of substances that are preparations containing narcotics. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
It was recognized as a type of intentional discrimination by the EEOC in 1980 and by the U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 5:16 am
And in the Flatow case, known as Flatow v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 4:14 pm
During the "unreviewed" Q3 2009 10-Q conference call, an embittered Patrick Byrne expressed his utter contempt for Grant Thornton saying: I am dissing [is people on the scene] -- I mean, I think Grant Thornton -- we're not going to be exchanging Christmas cards. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm
Rachlinski and Jourden’s test indicated that rights protected by property rules tended to show a stronger endowment effect than those protected by liabilities.[12] The test which was measured by a “willingness to sell/buy” indicated that a property regime produced more people who were unwilling to sell than a liabilities regime produced.[13] Furthermore the difference between the willingness to buy under a property regime vs. a liabilities regime was almost… [read post]
