Search for: "People v Samed (Steven)"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,394
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2011, 8:35 am
[Steven] contends that the desk contained only his papers and [Linda] had her own desk in the same room, but [she] appears to disagree. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:56 pm
" United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 3:26 pm
Open source v proprietary software". [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
By Steven G. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
By Steven G. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 1:50 pm
See, e.g., Bass v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 5:44 pm
Of course, Stevens isn't an obscenity case. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:58 am
People really divided. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
”), and Steven Weinstein (“Weinstein Tr. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:18 pm
As Patrick referenced, the Supreme Court recently struck down another censorious law in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 2:53 pm
Here are the facts of the case from the decision of the California Supreme Court on direct appeal, People v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 12:44 pm
(Can you say "Roe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm
As Jack and Steve have both noted, yesterday the Fourth Circuit issued its opinion in Lebron v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 8:39 am
Pomilia. - Steven M. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 2:29 pm
From Henry v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
” In the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro highlights an amicus brief filed in the same-sex marriage cases that “hopes to prove that decades of animus and homophobia in federal and state workplaces formed the backdrop for laws banning same-sex marriage. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:42 pm
The court did discuss US v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
Further, the Court held that the implication of a term is not dependent on proving the intention of the actual parties, but rather on what notional “reasonable people” in the position of the parties at the time of contracting would have agreed. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:38 am
This essay for our symposium is by Steven D. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 7:39 am
” In the free times, Eva Moore reports on the amicus brief filed by South Carolina in support of the states; the brief argues that the Fourteenth Amendment, “which promises equal protection to all people, doesn’t guarantee a right to same-sex marriage. [read post]
