Search for: "People v. Burden (1980)"
Results 221 - 240
of 409
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
This article will also review the surprising shift in the necessity challenge standard recently applied by the Michigan courts in the decisions of Village of Oxford v Nathan 1 Act 87 of 1980, MCL 213.51 et seq. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
Indeed, in People v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
United Kingdom (1980), 3 E.H.R.R. 408 (Comm.), at p. 415, applied in Re F (in utero), supra. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
As Justice Powell stated in 1980, and it still remains true, “this ‘means’ test has been virtually impossible to satisfy,” as Justice Powell said in Fullilove v. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 9:20 pm
Merryman, 630 F.2d 780, 785 (10th Cir. 1980); United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 8:16 am
Don’t want a situation where people don’t even bother with design patents, given their increasing use in fashion where there hasn’t been protection in the past. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
These objections are potentially true, but the burden remains on the proponent. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Universal City Studios, Inc., 618 F.2d 972, 977 (2d Cir. 1980) ("[S]ummary judgment has traditionally been frowned upon in copyright litigation. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
This court in People's Union for Democratic Rights & Others v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 3:38 pm
Finley (1980), 81 Ill.2d 317, 330 Laches is not a statute. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 11:43 am
In Troche v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 5:40 am
In 1980, to limit the burden on taxpayers, Congress added the Medicare Secondary Payer provisions (“MSP”) to the Medicare Act. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:33 am
Salbucci, 448 U.S. 83 (1980). [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
Standard of Review and Applicable LawThe test for legal sufficiency is "whether the evidence at trial would enable reasonable and fair-minded people to reach the verdict under review. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
They save people's lives every day - that's their job - and not incidentally they prescribe our clients' products while doing that. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 7:37 am
Dunn and McGrain v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
In Doe v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 11:41 pm
Atari Interactive v. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
However, the right to televise court proceedings was not among the rights recognized in the 1980 case or its progeny. [read post]
