Search for: "People v. Clinton"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,255
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am
McConnell’s argument is that those procedures were adopted by unanimous vote for the Clinton impeachment and that precedent should be followed here. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 9:58 pm
All this radically differs from the all-powerful image that many people have of Senator McConnell. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
As former Justice Benjamin Curtis, who dissented in Dred Scott v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 10:28 am
Until a few years ago, few people outside of tech policy circles knew much about those 26 words, which are better known as the key part of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
However performance in Simulated Client exercises DO predict this Simulated clients, who are lay people, are DISRUPTIVE, demonstrating the “cognitive poverty of conventional law school assessment. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
In 1976 in Elrod v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm
The 1895 decision in Sparf v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm
The 1895 decision in Sparf v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am
” In fact, Clinton’s defense lawyers never raised the clear statement rule argument. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 5:55 am
I explore that possibility in my next book, forthcoming this spring from Oxford: Gay Rights v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:39 am
[Walter Nixon v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:48 am
And the Court also split 4-4 in Texas v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Some of those very people, however, said Esposito’s claims are greatly embellished, or simply not true. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:40 am
" Ray v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
If you think of a “legal” doctrine as a rule according to which people adhere their behavior and pursuant to which parties can resolve disputes, executive privilege has not been a legal doctrine at all. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:33 am
Clinton D. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:35 am
We also looked at Office of Legal Counsel memoranda dealing with various narrow impeachment-related questions from the Clinton administration. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:52 am
As the Supreme Court made clear in Nixon v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
To her left is Justice Breyer, a Clinton appointee who once wrote a book about how the Constitution should be interpreted to advance the cause of democracy. [read post]
