Search for: "People v. Grant" Results 221 - 240 of 16,780
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
The ICO has issued a reprimand to West Midlands Police after the force repeatedly mixed up two people’s personal information. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 10:32 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
 What's the upshot for Section Three and Trump v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:28 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
ACLU, Feb. 29, 2024 "The United States District Court for the Western District of Texas today granted a motion for preliminary injunction to block Texas Senate Bill 4 (88-4), which would permit local and state law enforcement to arrest, detain, and remove people they suspect to have entered Texas from another country without federal authorization. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by lawbod
Now, as the Stormont Executive sits once more, it is granted an opportunity to rebuild its relationship with the public and work with individual campaigners to establish a cohesive legal and political process. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 5:12 pm by Earl Drott
While there are grounds for vacating unfavorable verdicts in car accident cases, courts do not grant such requests lightly, as demonstrated in a recent Texas case, Mark Mandel v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm by NARF
The People of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians (Ineffective Assistance of Counsel; Sentencing) The People of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:53 am by Guest Contributor
Circuit is considering direct challenges to the Good Neighbor Rule (Utah v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” It was taken for granted. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
The ICO also published new guidance for all organisations considering using people’s biometric data. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
Orrick issued an order that found that the complaint was “defective in many respects” and largely granted the defendants’ motions.[3] However, as is usual, the judge gave the artists and their legal teams “leave to amend to provide clarity regarding their theories of how each defendant separately violated their copyrights, removed or altered their copyright management information, or violated their rights of publicity and plausible facts in support. [read post]