Search for: "People v. Jacobs"
Results 221 - 240
of 658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2015, 2:49 am
Rather, a defendant must aim “to permanently deprive the victim[] of the property” (People v Medina, 18 NY3d 98, 105 [2011]; see People v Jennings, 69 NY2d at 118; People v Jacobs, 52 AD3d 432, 433 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 833 [2008]; see also People v Parker, 121 AD3d 1190, 1191 [2014]). [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 12:28 pm
This quote pretty much encapsulates the approach taken by the Supreme Court of Appeal in its judgment which it handed down earlier today in the matter of Schabir Shaik v The State. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Jacobs, 480 S.W.2d 602, 606 (Tex. 1972), with Ackermann v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 5:51 am
Reversing the Appellate Division, First Department, the New York Court of Appeals held in People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:05 am
Circuit Court of Appeals 10-10038 and International Airport Centers LLC v Jacob Citrin in the 7th U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 10:34 am
The full case opinion (Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:19 am
In the police interrogation context, many people are simply not inclined to do so thus, our Miranda rights may have less meaning under the hot lights of persistent, aggressive and skillful police interrogation.info@clarkstonlegal.comwww.clarkstonlegal.com [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:56 pm
In the police interrogation context, many people are simply not inclined to do so thus, our Miranda rights may have less meaning under the hot lights of persistent, aggressive and skillful police interrogation.info@clarkstonlegal.comwww.clarkstonlegal.com [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:06 am
Sometimes it smells, sometimes it is just unpleasant and people many times associate dog food with bad food. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am
” In an op-ed at Newsweek, Alida Garcia warns that “[ICE] admits it is reopening previously closed removal cases of DACA recipients, [which] could allow [the agency] to start detaining and deporting people as quickly as possible if the Supreme Court gives it the green light” in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 10:06 am
Rohini Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 5:00 am
Sys. v.] [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 12:00 am
So when Jacob deGrom went on the DL, last week, they recalled him. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:14 pm
Clark v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:23 pm
[What Swift v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 6:03 am
This case asks when the arbitration "agreement" in a consumer transaction can be invalidated.The case is Soliman v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 6:24 am
As the Second Circuit (Kearse, Lohier and Jacobs) notes, "each aspect warrants particularized analysis. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 5:35 am
State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 2:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:47 pm
Here is the abstract:In District of Columbia v. [read post]
