Search for: "People v. Klein" Results 221 - 240 of 267
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2024, 7:33 am
My thanks to the editors, who brilliantly guided this project along: Primavera de Filippi —CERSA / CNRS and Berkman-Klein Center / Harvard University;  Morshed Mannan —European University Institute; and Wessel Reijers —Paderborn University.Pix credit here My contribution focuses on trust in the quite remarkable transformation of corporate governance from the 1980s. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:35 am by Big Tent Democrat
GRAHAM: So America needs to get ready for this proposition that some people are going to be detained as enemy combatants, not criminals. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 4:20 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
" asks @dorfonlaw pjblack.me/zjl1Ap #lwb242 the fascinating story behind the case: "Lawrence v Texas: How Laws Against Sodomy Became Unconstitutional" pjblack.me/yW6J9C yay! [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:26 am by Steve Davies
 “Nationally, people are already suggesting boycotting Montana and Idaho’s important tourism industry, which is a top revenue producer for both states. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
There are a handful of other cases that reinforce the thrust of Ex Parte United States: People v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm by John Buhl
Supreme Court will hear arguments in South Dakota v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:00 pm
Joe Klein, Senator Government V. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 12:21 pm by Jason Rantanen
1) Give district courts discretion to punish frivolous suit 2) Forcing patent holders to be more clear in their claims in Biosig v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
Anti-branding/culture jamming movement has sprung up, cataloged in Naomi Klein’s No Logo. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Hypocrisy makes people uneasy because it suggests unfairness:  someone gets credit for holding a professed view without “doing the work” of acting on, or receiving the consequences of that view.[1] This form of human perception is not necessarily wrong:  in some cases the public position is indeed a dishonest front for the speaker’s real agenda. [read post]