Search for: "People v. Singer" Results 221 - 240 of 429
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2016, 12:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
Whether people in Maryland can speak lawfully depends on what they say: A scathing review of a teen idol’s newest single might seriously distress the singer, and thus trigger the statute, but a positive review will not; a harsh condemnation of a cheating ex-boyfriend might be seriously distress the ex, but praise of the ex will not. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm
Mr Clarkson denied the affair but in October 2010 obtained an injunction to restrain the publication of purported private information: AMM v HXW [2010] EWHC 2457. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:21 am by Jake Linford
The notion that people inspire songs is not new. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:41 pm by VMaryAbraham
It’s about how you take data, aggregate it and make it simpler to use,” says Singer. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 3:57 am by Terry Hart
One of the most relevant and thorough is US v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:51 am
Herr Ochsenknecht (the father) Privacy and personality rights: should there be different rules when it comes to media reports about people that are under-age? [read post]