Search for: "People v. Smith (1993)" Results 221 - 240 of 289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
Thanks to the New York Times and Matt Richtel for “Tainted Pork, Ill Consumers and an Investigation Thwarted. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:00 am by Administrator
The Bill enables people with terminal or life-shortening illnesses or progressive conditions which are terminal or life-shortening and who wish to end their own lives to obtain assistance in doing so. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac injury, constitute the… [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:00 pm by Mary A. Fischer
  “When staggering numbers of people were proven conclusively innocent of crimes they didn’t commit, a lot of people said, wait a minute, what kind of finality are we talking about if we’re talking about executing people who might be innocent. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am by Eric Muller
  In 1993, at the invitation of then-President of the University of North Carolina system C.D. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
v=NsJHqstPuNo     UPDATE: Governor Branstad signed the bill into law. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm by Marty Lederman
  [W]e do not want people to feel undignified when they walk into any place of business and do business that, you know, serves the public. . . . [read post]