Search for: "People v. Sole" Results 221 - 240 of 6,116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
Recently, the California Supreme Court stated, "even if acting on an anonymous tip, police may knock on the door of a residence, speak with the occupant, and request permission to enter and search" People v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 3:59 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Of some of that discussion, see http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/10/09/defending-the-myth-of-the-sole-inventor/id=19648/**In one commentary, the name "Ward Churchill" appeared. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:10 am by Matt DeVries
The UETA was recently relied upon by an appellate court in Tennessee, Waddle v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
Script-writer, Nicholas Martin, claimed sole authorship of the work. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
  The Bystander Rule for Emotional Distress Lawsuits There is a very limited exception that allows some people to file an emotional distress lawsuit based solely on something they witnessed. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:41 am by Jon Hyman
Recently, a California federal court examined this very issue in Sweet v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 11:50 am
Supreme Court ruling, attorneys are not allowed to exclude people from a jury solely because of their race.Earlier coverage is here. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 1:01 am
Over at Defending People, blogger and criminal defense lawyer Mark Bennett has been carrying on a discussion with his readers about legal ethics. [read post]