Search for: "People v. Souter" Results 221 - 240 of 462
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2010, 3:59 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
" 70,000 people in the US are over 100. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:00 am by Guest Blogger
” President Bush issued this statement as a way to steer clear of what had become by then the most explosive topic of Supreme Court politics, abortion rights and the standing of Roe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:34 am by Steve Hall
" In the book he attacks the Second Amendment decision in D.C. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:58 am by Betsy McKenzie
Could people put creches in a park and could they erect them in a courthouse? [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:24 pm by carie
"The institution is not going in the direction he thinks it should," he said.That was clear this year when he was on the losing side in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:34 pm
Rather, Justice Souter believes judges must look at the words and seek -- quote -- "to understand their meaning for living people. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 7:13 pm by Nathan
  We’d like to believe that people of Souter’s stature in the debate not only know what they think, but understand why they think it. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:00 pm
 The point is perhaps clearest in his concurrence in the judgment in Washington v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 9:01 am by Jeff Gamso
  But (and this is the ugly truth that Souter declines to mention) so did the personnel on the court.In any event, the real point for Souter is that the Constitution itself, the document, simply doesn't answer all questions.A choice may have to be made, not because language is vague but because the Constitution embodies the desire of the American people, like most people, to have things both ways. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:32 am by Jeff Gamso
  Those 26,000 people were previously classified by judges. [read post]