Search for: "People v. Sullivan" Results 221 - 240 of 1,105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2020, 6:53 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
He grieved this offense under state regulations that require the internal grievance people to rule on the grievance within 18 days of their receipt of the grievance. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm by Anna Salvatore, Benjamin Wittes
Flynn filed a motion to compel certain material under Brady v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 12:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan recognized that knowing or reckless falsehoods can be punished; but Garrison v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 12:52 pm by Donna Bader
In recent rulings, the Supreme Court filed several decisions that will make some people angry and others happy: In Trump v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm by Mark Lahn
This is what the Court of Appeal For Ontario decided in the case of R v Sullivan. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm by Mark Lahn
This is what the Court of Appeal For Ontario decided in the case of R v Sullivan. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
  This statute was mentioned by the Court in 1988 as support for its opinion in the famous independent counsel case, Morrison v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:22 am by Richard Hunt
The danger of being the enforcer The plaintiff in Sullivan v. [read post]