Search for: "People v. Thomas (1970)"
Results 221 - 240
of 254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm
THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill · Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University · Ingraham v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
New York: Harper and Row, 1970. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
New York: Harper and Row, 1970. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Most consumers agree that intellectual property law is essential to ensure that creators of inventions, ideas, designs, services and the like are rewarded for their creativity and to promote the continuation of such creations.[1] In order to grant creators with the incentive to continue creating, such creators must be equipped with the satisfaction of knowing that their creations will not be transformed into cheap imitations which will inevitably compete with their own original creations. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Thomas Carper, a Democrat who is now a U.S. senator. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
Thomas Morgan (D-Penn.), chair of the House Committee on International Relations, requested a Section 502B(c) report on countries including Argentina. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
The state is constituted by the union of people and government, and it is the state that claims against all other states the twin rights of territorial integrity and political sovereignty. . . . [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
A portion of the decision lamented the dearth of specifics offered by the People's Republic of China's State Secret Law with respect to determining whether information produced is protected and what liability would attach to that disclosure. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Data-Driven Regulatory Governance and Its Distorting Effects V. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Black, A Constitutional Faith (1968) Certain other works dealt with obscure matters or issues of foreign law, such as the following: John Marshall Harlan, Manning the Dikes; Some Comments on the Statutory Certiorari Jurisdiction and Jurisdictional Statement Practice of the Supreme Court of the United States (1958) Ruth Bader Ginsburg, A Selective Survey of English Language Studies on Scandinavian Law (1970) Stephen G. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Shaw for Amici Curiae Bank of America and BAC Home Loans Servicingon behalf of Real Parties in Interest.Wright, Finlay & Zak, Thomas Robert Finlay and Jennifer A. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
Instances might be cited, in which a conduct of this kind has saved the people from very fatal consequences of their own mistakes …. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 7:03 pm
Cochran v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm
Vladeck states that advise-and-consent models “depended on the fiction that people were meaningfully giving consent. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
Alexander Keung, Thomas Lane, and Tou Thao each face charges of aiding and abetting 3rd degree murder and aiding and abetting 2nd degree manslaughter. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:17 am
John DonohueIn my view, Justice Scalia blundered badly last week in his concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]
