Search for: "Person v. Company" Results 221 - 240 of 31,138
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2024, 12:17 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Much of the debate about the operation of s 9(3) in the context of generative AI has concerned whether the user of an AI programme, its programmer, the person responsible for model training, or the company providing users with access to the programme is the person who has made the arrangements necessary for the creation of any resulting work. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:37 am by Mark Schickman, Schickman Law
At the time he was hired, Jarrells and Applied entered into a proprietary information agreement, in which he agreed “to hold in strictest confidence, and not to use except for the benefit of the Company, or to disclose to any person, firm or corporation without written authorization of the Board of Directors of the Company, any trade secrets, confidential knowledge, data or other proprietary information. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
It was the criminal theory itself that seemed crafted around the standard for obscenity famously described by Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in the case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Court of Chancery recently examined such an agreement in In West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
Pham’s arrest is linked to an extensive investigation involving bribery with the Thuận An Group Joint Stock Company (Thuận An Group). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:40 am by Dylan Gibbs
It’s completely unacceptable that the person charged for this heinous crime is now out on bail. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:24 am by Felix Le Roux
        A South African company sought an order in terms of the Swaziland Companies Act against the directors of an Eswatini company, holding them personally liable for debts owed by the Eswatini company to the South African company. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:24 am by Felix Le Roux
        A South African company sought an order in terms of the Swaziland Companies Act against the directors of an Eswatini company, holding them personally liable for debts owed by the Eswatini company to the South African company. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:30 pm
Personally, though, I just don't see it.Regardless, at least until (and if) the law gets changed, that's currently the rule in California. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:50 am by James W. Ward
” Shah pointed to a California Supreme Court case (Schachter v. [read post]