Search for: "Piper v. Piper"
Results 221 - 240
of 476
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2017, 4:31 am
” At ACS Blog, Bidish Sarma focuses on the cert petition in one of the cases, Karsjens v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Nadarajah v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 9:08 am
Bank v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 1:08 am
For a very interesting contrast, see Irish Subcommittee v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:37 am
Joa, Inc. v Fameccanica Data SpA [2017] EWHC 1251 (IPEC), particularly considering the new trend to include added matter in the pleading point of patent cases.SugarHero and the Snow Globe Cupcakes - Copyright and Food VideosMathildelets us know about the recent filing of a copyright infringement claim by internet chef Elizabeth LaBau (known as SugarHero) against Television Food Network, relating to LaBau's cooking video of her flagship recipe “Snow Globe Cupcakes”.Mr… [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:19 am
Gillig, 602 F.3d at 1363; In re Piper Aircraft Corp., 244 F.3d 1289, 1298 (11th Cir. 2001); Curtis v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; see Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am
“‘Allegations regarding an act of deceit . . . must be stated with particularity'” (Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d at 838, quoting Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615). [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Cessna and Piper v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 3:59 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615; see Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:59 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; see Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 11:42 am
Caremark was recently cited with approval in Marchand v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On 28 July 2022, there were hearings in ABC and Others v London Borough of Lambeth and SJU and Others v London Borough of Lambeth before Nicklin J and in Nicolaisen v Nicolaisen before Jay J. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:32 am
http://tinyurl.com/29rkn7w • Brooks v. [read post]
11 Dec 2021, 11:53 am
(The case is Zachary Piper LLC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:45 am
As to a claim under Judiciary Law § 487 (1), “[a]llegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]). [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am
DLA Piper provides analysis here. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:22 am
The allegations must be pied with particularity (see Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP (US), 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], Iv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]). [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:14 pm
[S]ee also Day Zimmermann, Inc. v. [read post]
