Search for: "Potter v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 607
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2022, 1:00 am
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 of DCM (Optical Holdings) v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 12th October 2022. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:41 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 26/1/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, heard 7th December 2021 Canada Square… [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 7:53 am
Potter v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 8:53 am
Potter v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 7:53 am
Potter v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:19 pm
This movie has played on the Supreme Court Channel more times than the Harry Potter movies have played on cable TV.In Shoop v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:02 am
As such, GDPR did not apply (David Scott v LGBT Foundation Ltd [2020] EWHC 483 applied). [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 2:01 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 20/01/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, heard 7th December 2021 Canada Square… [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:10 pm
Matter of Potter v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
At the Washington Post, Tara Bahrampour reports on an estate sale at the home of the late Justice Potter Stewart. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 1:34 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 13/01/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021 Canada… [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:33 am
In one of Winslow’s last major cases, State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:44 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 12:10 pm
” Other memories are less reverent: Justice Potter Stewart, who had just quit smoking, chewing rubber bands during oral argument; or Chief Justice Warren Burger, who, rumored to ask at least one “dumb question” every argument, fulfilled that prediction during Little v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 6:46 pm
United States (11-182) — the Court instead unanimously vacated and remanded 8-0, FCC v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:02 am
On Thursday 27th April, the Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Worcestershire County Council) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 1957. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:53 am
[2016] EWHC 188 (Pat) is about the most recent practice direction which aligns the UK regime with the fast-approaching UPC's stated intention that all cases will be done and dusted within a year. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:20 am
On Tuesday 4th October, the Court heard the case of R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
Only the personnel of this Court did.Again, it's endemic.When the votes come out my way (as when the Ohio Supremes decided in State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
Only the personnel of this Court did.Again, it's endemic.When the votes come out my way (as when the Ohio Supremes decided in State v. [read post]
