Search for: "Powers v. State Bar (1988)" Results 221 - 240 of 351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2021, 7:43 am by Russell Knight
White, 484 U.S. 219, 225 (1988) (noting that the doctrine dates back to medieval times). [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Static Control counterclaimed for state and federal false advertising/antitrust claims. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 3:21 am by Peter Mahler
On its reverse side, the certificate states that the shares are subject to a 1988 shareholders agreement with stock transfer restrictions. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  Even the plaintiffs’ bar (through ATLA) has recognizedthat “patients . [read post]
Supreme Court later upheld this federal law, the Controlled Substances Act, or CSA, against a challenge contending that Congress did not have the power to regulate local, medicinal marijuana possession and use in 2003, in the well-known Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 3:38 am by SHG
As the court observed in its 1977 decision in Fiallo v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am by Andy Wright
The federal district court then indicated its agreement with the government stating that the plaintiff’s claims against the former vice president and members of Congress were “likely barred by absolute legislative immunity under the Speech or Debate clause. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 2:44 pm
United Technologies, 487 U.S. 500 (1988). [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:35 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That decision involved a 1988 ballot initiative in Arizona, declaring that English was to be the state’s official language. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
This loss of faith extends to some degree to the bar and bench. [read post]