Search for: "Prior v. Department of Revenue" Results 221 - 240 of 837
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2020, 7:13 am by Kalvis Golde
Montana Department of Revenue. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:12 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Frequently these disputed points are out in the open, with companies seeking guidance or letter rulings from revenue departments or, in D.C., the Office of Tax and Revenue (OTR). [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 11:44 am by Larry
That distinction comes from a couple prior decisions of the Federal Circuit including AMS Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:06 am by Peter Mahler
Court of Appeals (which includes federal courts in New York) is Friedman v Revenue Management, Inc., 38 F3d 668 [2d Cir. 1994], where the court applied Burford abstention to dismiss a complaint seeking judicial dissolution of a New York corporation under Section 1104 of the Business Corporation Law based on shareholder deadlock. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
But Republican legislators openly advocated for the impeachment of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Commissioner John Koskinen in 2016 because of the IRS’s responses to their subpoenas. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:13 am by CFM Admin
However, CA RIAs can avoid these additional requirements by engaging an auditor (that is an independent public accountant registered with the PCAOB) to prepare and distribute audited financial statement to all investors ( or other beneficial owners_ of the pooled investment vehicle, and to the Commissioner of the California Department of Business Oversight (“DBO”). [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
Prior to this change, there was no warning, and a first strike would result in a 90-day freeze on live streaming. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Sources: State statutes; state revenue departments; Tax Foundation research. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
Prior to the issuance of these rules, large employers (those with 50 or more employees) were prohibited from offering HRAs that would reimburse employees for the cost of individual health insurance policies. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Illinois Department of Revenue (1967) and Quill Corp. v. [read post]