Search for: "Range v. Attorney General United States" Results 221 - 240 of 1,640
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2022, 8:37 am by Eric Goldman
The court concludes: Whether it is wise for members of the United States Congress to block critical constituents from their social-media accounts is not for a court to say. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 10:51 am by William Appleton
Morhard discussed the applicability of biotechnology for a range of issues, such as energy and food security, and offered ways the United States can lead biotechnology advancements. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am by David Kopel
" The League is led by James Fotis, who for many years oversaw an NRA-supported effort to elect judges and state attorneys general who opposed firearms restrictions. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 7:56 am by Anna Bower
§ 3331 authorizes the attorney general to empanel a special grand jury to investigate criminal activity in a jurisdiction. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:01 am by Robert Liles
As a result of that change, the Attorney General immediately delegated his authority to the Assistant Attorney General (AAG) for the Civil Division, who, in turn, re-delegated the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands to the 93 U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
This newest update includes leading cases ranging from the classic 1970s landmark judgment in Klass and others v Germany to the Haščák v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:59 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division (EEOC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Many are reported to be seeking asylum.[1] They have active proceedings to determine their status and, pending such determination, are authorized to remain in the United States. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am by Dennis Crouch
” But, the court found that singular prophetic “passing reference” “at the end of one range among a series of ranges” was insufficient to actually the notion that the patentee possessed an “effective treatment” at the 480 mg dosage. [read post]