Search for: "Responding to Negative Online Reviews"
Results 221 - 240
of 831
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2021, 11:34 am
In a story that is sadly all too familiar, the Oregon Supreme Court has issued an opinion and public reprimand of Brian Conry, an immigration lawyer who had the temerity to respond to three negative reviews posted online by a former client. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 11:52 am
The Oregon Supreme Court has reprimanded an attorney for violating the duty of confidentiality in response to negative online reviews A dissatisfied former client of respondent Brian Conry posted three negative online reviews about him. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 8:41 am
As a best practice, lawyers should consider not responding to a negative post or review, because doing so may draw more attention to it and invite further response from an already unhappy critic. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 1:46 am
The government responds At the same time, the government response to the White Paper was published. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 11:13 am
Anderson petitioned the Fifth Circuit for review, arguing that the penalty was arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 6:56 am
What you need to do is see how the practice responds to negative comments. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 7:23 am
June 18, 2021), plaintiffs neurology clinic and neurologist filed this suit against defendant after defendant left a negative review of plaintiff doctor online. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 1:40 pm
Appendix L of the DIOG addresses how the bureau can use “publicly available information” found online. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 2:20 pm
Luckily, the best approach to managing social media reviews is to follow a similar plan to the one you use for general online reviews. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:31 am
Maybe en banc or Supreme Court review will correct this. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 8:31 am
If passed, the regulation would recognize an ownership right in personal data and a right to “know, copy, correct, and delete” such data held online. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 7:41 pm
Respond to negative reviews and request removal of fake and unjustified reviews. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 9:20 am
Pix Credit HERE; video may be accessed HERE Now well over a generation ago, Michel Foucault famously noted that the regulation was about virtually anything but intimate relations. [read post]
28 May 2021, 8:05 pm
As of May 2021, the federal government is providing vaccines at no cost to everyone ages 12 and older.There are many resources available to employees seeking more information about how to get vaccinated:The federal government’s online vaccines.gov site can identify vaccination sites anywhere in the country (or https://www.vacunas.gov for Spanish). [read post]
26 May 2021, 2:42 pm
The point is not that experiences of racism are like these other experiences or to cast real experiences of racism in a negative light. [read post]
13 May 2021, 2:20 am
97% of people read local business reviews 94% of respondents in one survey stated they’ve avoided a company because of a bad online review About 80% of consumers changed their minds about a recommended purchase after reading a negative online review 93% state online reviews affect their purchasing decisions If someone’s researching your business, if they see three negative pieces, your… [read post]
11 May 2021, 4:15 pm
To which, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (“MIB”) and Ministry of Information and Technology (“MIT”) responded that they didn’t possess any legal authority to regulate online content. [read post]
10 May 2021, 4:54 pm
While the core decision of the Board is binding, the policy recommendations are not, although Facebook is obliged to respond to them, according to the Charter of the Board (Article 4. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 4:41 pm
The platform should decide about the reporting, if, in its view, the content is criminal and has lasting negative effects on the exercise of freedom of expression in the social media – by silencing other users through intimidation. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 6:58 am
They were both arrested after allegedly responding to an escort ad to have sex with a 17-year-old girl. [read post]
