Search for: "Rider v State" Results 221 - 240 of 782
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2018, 3:35 am by Scott Bomboy
” The Abood Court said that a state could balance managing its employees and labor interests to avoid “free rider” situations where non-union workers benefited from a union’s advocacy for pay raises and other benefits without paying for the negotiation process. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:34 am by Valerio De Stefano
In the Unites States, a federal judge followed the same line of reasoning in the case Razak v Uber when he decided that Uber drivers are independent contractors because they “work when they want to and are free to nap, run personal errands, or take smoke breaks between trips”. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:45 pm by Reeve T. Bull
A final approach may entail handing back more regulatory power to the states and localities, creating a natural experiment of the type described by Justice Louis Brandeis in New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 6:04 am by Scott R. Anderson, Molly E. Reynolds
And there’s a good reason for that: “legislative vetoes” and other conditional authorizations that try to circumvent the normal legislative process are generally seen as unconstitutional under the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 11:38 am by Matt Maurer
In the recent case of Heller v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:07 am by Joy Waltemath
There were over 1,700 Uber drivers operating during that time and they served over 700,000 riders during that time. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A simple rider on an appropriations bill could add the seven little words that statu [read post]