Search for: "Ronald Mann" Results 221 - 240 of 442
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2015, 12:55 pm by Richard M. Re
There is a lot to say about Sharif, and, over at SCOTUSBlog, there are illuminating posts by both Ronald Mann and my colleague Dan Bussel. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:00 am by Amy Howe
Marshall claim is permissible under Article III so long as the parties consent, comes from this blog’s Ronald Mann, while commentary for this blog comes from Daniel Bussel. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
Ronald Mann analyzed the decision for this blog. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Reconciling Privacy and Speech in the Era of Big Data: A Comparative Legal Analysis, U of Alabama Legal Studies Research Paper, Ronald J. [read post]
7 May 2015, 7:27 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
  In addition to Arizona Congressman David Schweikert and representatives of USHCC and CFSA, other  guest speakers include Professors Ronald Mann and Jennifer Priestley, the authors of two recent studies examining the effect of short-term lending on consumers’ financial health. [read post]
6 May 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Ronald Mann covered Monday’s decision in Bullard v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 5:00 am by David Lander
With help from Ronald Mann I hope to do a small empirical study that others might replicate in their localities.Such information is crucial in figuring out the right size and shape for the preference recovery net. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 5:19 pm
He reaches this conclusion without relying upon the conclusions drawn by computer models or contested studies, such as Michael Mann’s infamous “Hockey Stick. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:40 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ronald Mann's discussion of oral argument in Marvel suggest bad news for arguments made by Legal "economists"--Melnik repeatedly offered the only answer he had, the consensus of informed economic analysts that the rule has no justification in economic analysis. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:28 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage of that opinion comes from this blog’s Ronald Mann, with commentary from Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Ronald Mann has our coverage of Wednesday’s second oral argument, in the bankruptcy fees case Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:18 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
Kaplinsky We recently wrote about two studies, one by Professor Ronald Mann and the other by Professor Jennifer Lewis Priestley, that cast serious doubt on the benefit to payday loan borrowers of an ability-to-repay requirement and limits on rollovers for payday loans, two elements that the CFPB is expected to include in its payday loan proposal. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 5:37 am by Ann Bartow
’” (P. 4, citing to Ronald Mann and Seth Belzley, The Promise of Intermediary Liability.) [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 4:25 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann covered the decision for this blog; other coverage comes from Jess Bravin in The Wall Street Journal, David Savage in the Los Angeles Times, and Hera Arsen at the Ogletree Deakins blog. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 5:00 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann covered the decision, authored by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, for this blog; other coverage comes from Taylor Gillan of JURIST. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann covered the decision for this blog, with other coverage coming from Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News, Daniel Fisher of Forbes, and Bradley McAllister of JURIST. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
[transcript; Ronald Mann/SCOTUSBlog; WSJ editorial; Courthouse News; earlier here and here] Tweet Tags: military, qui tam, Supreme Court, whistleblowersDon’t hold us to time limits for suing, the nation’s at war is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 7:20 pm by A. Brian Albritton
Argument analysis: Justices dubious of government's broad reading of False Claims ActDear readers: I commend to you the excellent analysis by Ronald Mann of SCOTUSblog of the oral argument held today at the Supreme Court in the case of Kellogg Brown and Root v. [read post]