Search for: "Rutledge v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 271
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2010, 8:09 am
He is a frequent commentator on constitutional issues and the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm
Wade, but maintaining that state-imposed twenty-four-hour waiting periods and biased counseling before a woman can have an abortion were invalid); and his dissents in Bowers v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:15 pm
United States.) [read post]
12 May 2010, 11:03 am
Smith, who teaches criminal justice at Michigan State University. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:05 pm
In one of his opinions for the Court, Heckler v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 1:09 pm
As he wrote in dissent in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:52 am
For example, I was never even asked about Roe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:42 am
United States (upholding a military curfew on Japanese-Americans living in certain “military areas” in California) and Korematsu v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:32 pm
United States (upholding a military curfew on Japanese-Americans living in certain “military areas” in California) and Korematsu v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:37 pm
United States (upholding a military curfew on Japanese-Americans living in certain “military areas” in California) and Korematsu v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:50 am
Those rulings harkened back to Stevens' own role as a law clerk to Justice Wiley Rutledge in a 1948 post-World War II ruling Ahrens v Clark. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm
Rutledge Jr., the last of President Franklin D. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 11:30 pm
In Foley v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
In that spirit, Roberts last week denounced President Obama’s criticism of the Court in his State of the Union address, saying that the occasion had “degenerated to a political pep rally. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 7:12 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 6:09 am
Kent Rutledge and James C. [read post]
31 May 2009, 11:10 pm
Valtierra v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:16 pm
Kelvin Rutledge, again rather valiantly, submitted an argument drawing on certain sentences from the judgments in Hammersmith & Fulham v Monk and Crawley BC v Ure but these cases involved joint tenants and were not relevant to this issue. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 7:41 am
On page 11 of the opinion, to support the argument that the interpretation of words in the Constitution should be given a uniform meaning -- a proposition with which I generally agree -- Justice Richman first cites and relies upon the Supreme Court's opinion in Tidewater (which held that the District of Columbia was not a "State" for Article III diversity purposes). [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:29 pm
The Court, in Fisher v. [read post]
