Search for: "SCOTT, M.D."
Results 221 - 240
of 245
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2019, 9:56 am
On the government side, on February 11, 2019, outgoing FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D. announced that FDA is now engaged in the “most significant modernization[ ] of dietary supplement regulation and oversight in more than 25 years. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Templeton, MA; Scott Lashua, President) 2020 Starts Now, Inc. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
LexisNexis has selected some of the top “noteworthy” panel decisions issued by the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board during the period January through June 2023. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm
Scott, 512 F.Supp.2d 613, 623 (N.D. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
M.D. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm
Island Harbor Beach Club, LLC, 2022 WL 1773973, at *2 (M.D. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:12 pm
Like most of you I’ve been working from home for the last couple of months, meaning primarily that my dogs are getting a lot of exercise. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac injury, constitute the… [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
For contractors who often subject to one or more of federal environmental laws or regulations, below is a brief report on some the significant environmental law and administrative cases decided since late June of 2015 by jurisdiction: District of Columbia Energy Future Coalition, et al. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:35 am
Back in 2001, in the aftermath of the silicone gel breast implant litigation, I participated in a Federal Judicial Center (FJC) television production of “Science in the Courtroom, program 6” (2001). [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
In this post we discuss something that most definitely is not near and dear to our hearts. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 4:44 pm
A review of the OCR data base of unsecured electronic protected health information breaches reveals that OCR has received a wave of required unsecured electronic health information breach notifications impacting 500 or more individuals arising from hacking of electronic systems or e-mail since January 1, 2021, including notices from Apple Blossom Family Practice VA Healthcare Provider (500 individuals/Network Server Hacking/IT Incident); Network Server; Texas ENT Specialists TX Healthcare… [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
June 26, 2009 - Supreme Court Hands Down Bevy of Opinions COURT FINDS VAGUENESS IN CURRENT LAW AND SPLITS ON EFFECTIVE DATE OF APPELLATE DECISIONEdwards Aquifer Authority v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm
In addition, Plaintiff has sued Scott Stewart, a field sales representative for Boston Scientific, who allegedly "maintained, sold, serviced, controlled, installed and removed" the Device. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm
Alonso, M.D., Def. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
One such Dred Scott case was the result of a bench trial in a federal district court in Atlanta, in Wells v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
See M.D. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
The following post is exclusively the work of the Reed Smith side of the blog.Sometimes the smallest, least significant type of lawsuit can illustrate cracks in the edifice of the largest, most consequential litigation. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Standards lowered further to facilitate robo-litigation with sloppy affidavits and minimal documentation in consumer debt litigation A February 2019 panel opinion of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Houston marks a new nadir in the evolving jurisprudence governing credit card collection cases in Texas. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
We've done so many posts on removal - for you non-lawyers that means moving cases that were originally filed in state court into federal court - that even we have a hard time keeping track. [read post]
