Search for: "STATE v. LOW" Results 221 - 240 of 10,576
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2018, 2:29 am
The Court noted that, although the Board of Appeal examined the possibility that the public concerned would establish a link between the marks at issue, it first based its analysis on an incorrect assessment of the similarity of the marks at issue [average, not ‘at most very low’].Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 LV argued that the Board of Appeal could not simply state that it was not bound by previous EUIPO decision-making practice or earlier… [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 1:15 pm by Gene Quinn
The state of patent eligibility in America is shocking. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:37 am by Adam Bednar
 But the state has no intention of reviewing how it awards tax credits for low income housing. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 9:15 am by Paul Caron
Rev. 791 (2014) Edward Lowe (J.D. 2015, UConn), Mashantucket Pequot Tribe v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 2:25 pm by Harold O'Grady
Wainwright and unanimously ruled later that year on March 18 at 372 U.S. 335 that states had the obligation to provide counsel for defendants who are unable to afford an attorney, extending the Constitutional right to counsel in criminal cases to poor and low-income people. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Brownsville Division issued a ruling on August 6 in the case of La Union del Pueblo Entero v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 3:14 pm by Heather Cobun
State of Maryland, led to the creation of the Thornton Commission and a statewide funding formula intended to help children from low-income families who needed ... [read post]
16 May 2008, 11:22 am
Baker, a case challenging Colorado's exclusion of "pervasively sectarian institutions" from its tuition assistance programs for low-income students attending colleges and universities in the state. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 3:09 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On the point of absence of power, Carnwath stated that there was statutory authority provided by the EU Regulation 81, which was given effect by the European Communities Act 1971, to satisfy the principle in Entick v Carrington that interference by the state with individual property rights cannot be justified by the exercise of prerogative powers, unsupported by specific statutory authority. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 2:35 pm by Steven R. Morrison
 I agree that the Abu Ghayth case is an easy one both normatively and pursuant to the very low bar set for speech-as-material-support by the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On October 10, 2013, Kathryn Rivera filed a motion to dismiss the plenary action for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]