Search for: "STATE v. MILKS" Results 221 - 240 of 838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2010, 9:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 1992) (finding of "obvious design choice" precluded where the claimed structure and the function it performs are different from the prior art).HOWEVER, the Supreme Court case of KSR v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 3:13 am
This is followed by an instruction that a prominent statement printed in bold letters of at least 3mm in height stating “USE UNDER MEDICAL SUPERVISION” shall also appear on the label. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:30 am by Jon Sands
Arizona (Phoenix).Milke v. [read post]
  DFA is the largest dairy cooperative in the United States, and it not only produces, but also processes, markets and distributes raw Grade A milk. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 11:27 am by John C. Manoog III
The Plaintiffs’ Argument Against Transfer The plaintiffs stated that the defendant produced and distributed milk and related products throughout the country, including in New York, and that the defendant maintained an administrative office in New York. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Aziz, Veiled Discrimination, (March 3, 2014).Kenneth Lasson, Sacred Cows, Holy Wars: Exploring the Limits of Law in the Regulation of Raw Milk and Kosher Meat, (March 6, 2014).Rabia Belt, When God Demands Blood: Unusual Minds and the Troubled Juridical Ties of Religion, Madness, and Culpability, (March 1, 2014).Teemu Ruskola, What is a Corporation? [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:16 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, many factories in Russia, Ukraine and other ex-Soviet states were quick to register popular Soviet brands as their own, leading to numerous legal disputes.For instance, in 2018, the Russian IP court heard a dispute over the traditional Soviet wrapping for condensed milk. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:40 pm by Cicely Wilson
However, given the court’s precedent, the court held that the EEOC’s argument that Houston Funding discharged the employee because she was lactating or expressing milk stated a cognizable sex discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq. [read post]
12 May 2018, 9:54 am by Eric Goldman
Vodka and Milk * Section 512(f) Complaint Survives Motion to Dismiss–Johnson v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 3:13 am
The hearing on April 16th will be held at Georgia State University College of Law in Atlanta. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:59 am
Based on recent judicial decisions in the Eighth Circuit (Jones v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:57 am
 Now that this issue has been cunningly side-stepped by use of the telephone, diplomatic relations have been informally established and the security guards have been instructed to leave a bowl of milk at the front door in case the Kat should spring a surprise visit to Geneva ... [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:41 am by Drew Falkenstein
The judge's full opinion in Commisioner of Minnesota Dept. of Ag v. [read post]