Search for: "STATE v. PATEL" Results 221 - 240 of 564
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2017, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
Lincoln’s Trident: The West Gulf Blockading Squadron during the Civil War; William Davenport Mercer’s Diminishing the Bill of Rights: Barron v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Baltimore City Circuit Court has vacated the initial Patel v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 10:33 am by Jenny Gesley
The Ordinance was challenged  by a person acting as an accountant for a temple trust before the Allahabad High Court in B Ram Lal v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 8:06 am by Roshni Patel and Kim Phan
Notably, the report states that the CFPB has “targeted substantial resources” to improving the accuracy of consumer information and will continue to do so. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Bell Canada, 2017 FC 6 https://t.co/Z80SOcWu44 -> Big win for Bell in major patent case, Mediatube Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
He served as Missouri state director for Sen. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  Such legislation would almost certainly pass constitutional muster: Under South Dakota v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:38 am by Eugene Volokh
But I wouldn’t have noticed any of this if it weren’t for Matthew Chan, the target of Patel v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh and Paul Alan Levy
Patel’s motion states that Patel did not actually file the lawsuit, and it attaches a letter from Patel’s lawyer to Richart Ruddie. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 2:26 pm by Ilya Somin
September 14, noon to 1 PM, George Mason University, Scalia Law School, Arlington, VA: Debate on executive power over immigration, and United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm by Eric Goldman
2016 has been a tough year for Section 230 jurisprudence, and the nadir (so far) was the appellate court ruling in Hassell v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:36 am by Dan Tench and Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
This is relevant to the judgment in Patel v Mirza (which had not been released at the date of our interview) relating to illegality: “The whole issue of how the Courts approach illegality as a defence to claims in contract and tort has been, to a degree, shaped by the Law Commission’s work on that area of law. [read post]