Search for: "STATE v. QUILL" Results 221 - 240 of 264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  As in other states, Louisiana law requires employers to pay into an unemployment insurance fund to cover the cost of state unemployment benefits. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:42 am by Lyle Denniston
The Court’s refusal on Monday to hear two new cases challenging state taxes on Internet-only sales followed a pattern in recent years, in which the Court has refused repeatedly to reconsider or to further clarify its famous 1992 decision in Quill Corp., v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Wayfair, arguing that “the Supreme Court should overrule Quill in the Court’s role as guardian of the states against federal commandeering. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm by Daniel Shaviro
That is, one is looking at the Arizona rule independently of the question of how it fits with other states' rules.Bibb balancing - In Bibb v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:53 pm
"Justice Curtis, offered the following interpretation in his dissent in Dred Scott v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 10:00 pm
United States, 848 F.2d 362, 364 [2d Cir1988] ). [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 10:07 am by Tracy Coenen
Quilling, 130 Wis. 318, 110 N.W. 173, 176 (1907). [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm by John Elwood
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 17-71, and Markle Interests, LLC. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
” Three years later, in Back to the Internet Taxation Future, reacting to a reappearance of the proposal to permit state 1 to require retailers in state 2 with no state 1 connection to be taxed by state 1, I explained why progress had not been made, pointing out the inability of legislators and others to distinguish between sales and use taxes, the silliness of claims that internet retailers are not required to collect sales taxes at all for any… [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
” Though she gives no citation so that one can determine which Supreme Court case she wants to highlight, she surely is referring to Quill Corp. v. [read post]