Search for: "SUMMERS v. POWERS"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,006
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2013, 10:51 am
We previewed the Chafin case on this site when certiorari was granted last summer. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 11:01 pm
The Classic Antitrust Case of Toys “R” Us v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 1:20 pm
See also Minnesota v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
A year later (this past summer), the Court (this time by a 5-4 vote), in Rucho v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 1:02 pm
When the Dodd-Frank Act passed into law last summer it failed to give private litigants the power to sue "aiders and abettors" under federal securities fraud laws. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 4:19 pm
This morning, in New Process Steel v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 8:34 pm
Porter and Gravel-Henkel v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm
One of them convened a mock Article V convention last summer with delegations (commonly Republican state legislators) from 49 states. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:44 am
(ii) The Strike Out Appeal In Summers v Fairclough Homes [2012] UKSC 26, Lord Clarke held that that the court has power to strike out a statement of claim on the ground that the claim is an abuse of the process of the court at any time. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am
On Monday, September 26, the Justices will return from the Court’s summer recess. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:15 am
In its highly controversial 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:25 am
The court reiterated the standard that it had announced in Lundy v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 12:15 am
Mallory v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:06 am
(RES) TZ 2 SP33 2011 Civil Rights With all deliberate speed : implementing Brown v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 7:33 am
City of Boston, to "Fan Cries Foul," (Jeffery Swiecicki v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 10:03 am
With the Supreme Court approaching the start of summer, the justices will likely decide the court’s major remaining cases by late June. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 4:33 am
It points out that the options remaining to try to regain integrity in the system depend upon a few cases yet pending: The two categories of cases not targeted for dismissal in the United States' instant motion to dismiss are those brought against governmental entities (Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc v Bush, No C 07-0109; Center for Constitutional Rights v Bush, No C 07-1115; Guzzi v Bush, No C 06-6225; Shubert v Bush, No C 07-0693) and those brought… [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
In Bellotti v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
For most in the Northern Hemisphere, summer is officially here. [read post]
