Search for: "Sanders v. Sanders" Results 221 - 240 of 1,345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2009, 9:16 pm
  For instance, it caused the Court of Appeals to order supplemental briefing in Sanders v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:24 pm
IPKat reader and enthusiast Carlton Daniel (Squire, Sanders & Dempsey (UK) LLP) was so excited about the nearly-recent decision in Office of Fair Trading v Purely Creative (Chancery Division, England and Wales) [2011] EWHC 106 (Ch) that he offered to write it up for us. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 2:07 pm
EPA agreed with environmentalists on four of the eight challenges they brought against the PSD and Title V operating permits issued by Kentucky to TVA’s Paradise Fossil Fuel plant in Drakesboro, Ky., in November 2007. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 6:31 am
   Among other matters, Rod argued and won the iconic case of Mills Acquisition Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 6:31 am
   Among other matters, Rod argued and won the iconic case of Mills Acquisition Co. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:24 am by Broc Romanek
Interestingly, there is not a legal definition of "funds legally available," despite the Delaware Chancery Court's decision last year in SV Investment Partners v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:32 pm
Sanders, No. 09-0013/AF. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
   Sander v Westchester Reform Temple 2024 NY Slip Op 03064 Decided on June 5, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
   Sander v Westchester Reform Temple 2024 NY Slip Op 03064 Decided on June 5, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:43 am by Professor Alberto Bernabe
  This means that in a case under the survival statute, it is possible the surviving spouse will get a much more reduced recovery - or none at all.In this new case, called Sanders v. [read post]