Search for: "Sears Roebuck "
Results 221 - 240
of 424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2011, 12:54 pm
According to the Associated Press, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals made the request on behalf of a woman who sued Sears, Roebuck & Co. after she was involved in a car accident with one of the company's vans. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:54 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., No. 10-1087 (U.S. pet. for cert. filed Mar. 2, 2011). [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 10:41 am
Sears Roebuck Co. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:06 pm
In a recent blog post, our Boston injury lawyers reported on the fact that DiBona’s parents have filed a Massachusetts wrongful death lawsuit against Sears Roebuck and Co. and several other parties. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 11:02 pm
., (an owner/operator of the mall where the incident occurred,) Mayflower Auburn LP and the Mall At Auburn LLC (also owner/operators of the mall,) Sears Roebuck and Co. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 9:10 pm
Now, his family has filed an Auburn, Massachusetts wrongful death lawsuit against Sears Roebuck and Co., the Simon Property Group, the Mall at Auburn LL, Schindler Elevator Corp., Botany Bay Construction Co., and Mayflower Auburn LP. seeking unspecified damages for gross negligence and negligence. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:19 am
This is a smokin' hot subject, particularly in light of the ADA Amendments Act and its regulations, which expand the ADA's coverage to a dramatically larger population, the "new," more activist EEOC under Chair Jacqueline Berrien, and two recent multi-million-dollar settlements in leave-of-absence lawsuits brought by the EEOC against Sears, Roebuck & Co. and Supervalu, Inc. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:13 am
Sears Roebuck & Co. case (which resulted in a $6.2 million settlement), offered the following five observations on the EEOC’s view of these policies: An inflexible period of disability leave, even if substantial, is not sufficient to satisfy an employer’s duty of reasonable accommodation. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 12:39 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Case No. 04-CV-7282 (N.D. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 11:50 am
The EEOC in 2009 settled a landmark case against Sears Roebuck & Co. for a record $6.2 million, alleging that the company’s leave policy violated the ADA. [read post]
5 May 2011, 6:49 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., 312 N.J. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:59 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., No. 4:09-cv-5744-CW (N.D. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 7:15 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542,1548 (Fed. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 1:39 am
Sears, Roebuck & Company, 792 N.E.2d 145 (Mass. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542,1548 (Fed. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:31 am
” Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:45 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542, 1549 (Fed. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 11:15 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 252 N.J. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:13 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co.) has nothing to do with punitive damages. [read post]
