Search for: "Sharp v. Thomas"
Results 221 - 240
of 475
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
PCC staff are available at all times to advise members of the public further, and to offer practical, immediate assistance.” Since last week’s round up there are a number of “resolved” PCC complaints to report: Mr Julian Assange v The Observer The Observer, clause 1, 09/03/2012; Mrs Christine Hemming v Sunday Mercury, clause 1, 08/03/2012; Mrs Carol Mlatem v South Wales Argus, clause 3, 08/03/2012; Ms Pamela Fenton v Sunday Mail, clause 1,… [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
In the Proposition 8 case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:04 am
United States, 405 U.S. 150 [1972]; Thomas v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:04 am
ZAM v CFW & Anor [2011] EWHC 476 (QB). [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 9:57 am
* Jammie Thomas says she would do it all over again [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:50 am
., Thomas E. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:18 am
Judging from this morning’s oral argument in Lockhart v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 7:48 am
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
The Supreme Court’s consideration of these issues (and of the impact of s 377 on personal autonomy and privacy in general) on appeal in Koushal v Naz Foundation (“Koushal”) was notoriously cursory, as explored by Sheikh and Narrain.[1]The complex interplay between formal criminalisation, a lack of reported prosecutions and societal stigma is reflected both in the sharp disparity between Naz Foundation and Koushal’s treatment of s 377 and to diverse,… [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
The Supreme Court’s consideration of these issues (and of the impact of s 377 on personal autonomy and privacy in general) on appeal in Koushal v Naz Foundation (“Koushal”) was notoriously cursory, as explored by Sheikh and Narrain.[1]The complex interplay between formal criminalisation, a lack of reported prosecutions and societal stigma is reflected both in the sharp disparity between Naz Foundation and Koushal’s treatment of s 377 and to diverse,… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 12:03 pm
" So said Congress, so says the law, and so said the Supreme Court in Diamond v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:20 pm
[FN1] Justice Scalia has a more robust concept of stare decisis than, say, Justice Thomas. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am
In 1925, in its decision in Gitlow v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm
Bowker v Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, heard 21 October 2010 (Sharp J). [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
In the Courts On Friday 13 January 2012 the Administrative Court (Toulson LJ, Sweeney and Sharp JJ) heard a remarkable application in the case of R (on the application of Associated Newspapers) v Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm
On 6 and 7 October 2021, the Court of Appeal (Sharp P, Elisabeth Laing and Warby LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Soriano v Forensic News (from the decision of Jay J on 15 January 2021, [2021] EWHC 56 (QB)). [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 01741-20 A man v thesun.co.uk, 11 Victims of sexual assault (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 28580-20 Portes v Metro, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 28482-20 Chott v Yellow Advertiser, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 11743-20… [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 11:38 am
Its subject matter is the protracted civil litigation that extended from a brief County Court hearing in 2007 to the Supreme Court judgment of Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am
On Monday, June 24, Justice Ginsburg summarized her sharp disagreement with the ruling in Fisher v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:58 am
Kennedy and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
