Search for: "Smith v. District of Columbia" Results 221 - 240 of 415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Sterling Drug, Inc., 416 F.2d 417, 426 (2d Cir. 1969).District of Columbia: McNeil Pharmaceutical v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 4:45 am by jonathanturley
In making the argument, Hunter will have to claim that references to gun ownership by “law-abiding citizens” in past cases like District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:52 am by INFORRM
Libel Decisions from Other Jurisdictions In Best v Weatherall 2010 BCCA 202 the British Columbia Court of Appeal allowed the claimant’s appeal in a libel action concerning a defamatory email and awarded damages of Can$3,000 (£2,000). [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm by Orin Kerr
District of Columbia, which involved trespass arrests at a loud party held in a vacant house. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
”   Such language, it added, is absolutely essential, under the Smith v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:42 am by Lyle Denniston
The Nordyke case had begun as an attempt to gain Second Amendment protection for possession of guns, going to court initially almost nine years before the Supreme Court ruled in District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, and Smith v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:23 am by Aaron Tang
Our first topic of the week is Florence v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm by David Kopel
By the en banc majority's theory, lightly premised on a tendentious reading of the Supreme Court's District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Searle & Co., 567 A.2d 398, 400-01 (Del. 1989).District of Columbia: Mampe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Alpine Electronics of America (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: NPE patentee denied permanent injunction: LaserDynamics, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
Alpine Electronics of America (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: NPE patentee denied permanent injunction: LaserDynamics, Inc. v. [read post]