Search for: "Smith v. Field"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,024
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2020, 10:31 am
Jan. 13, 2016) (Myerscough, J.) [7] Smith v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
When the working class threatened the interests of robber barons in late nineteenth century, for example, the illiterate and semiliterate poor were kept from the polls through literacy tests and poll taxes, not unlike the restrictive voter identification laws introduced after the Shelby County v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 5:01 am
The argument of counsel in Smith v. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
Prime Minister Boris Johnson confirmed the UK will seek to diverge from EU data protection rules and establish their own ‘sovereign’ controls in the field. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 12:43 am
Topics will include, amongst others: the implications of non-obviousness for follow-on medical innovation (e.g. drug repurposing) after the UK Supreme Court's 2019 decision in Actavis v ICOS; the current and future roles of competition law in controlling drug prices, including an update on Flynn and Pfizer; and the potential effect of Brexit on the trade of medical products. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 8:00 am
Gutierrez v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm
In Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2935 (QB) (see our blog here) the defendant blogger’s public interest defence failed because he did not adequately plead and prove that he had believed it was in the public interest to publish the statement complained of. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm
Rehana Ahmed-Saucedo, Sonal Singh, and Feng Liu-Smith. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
The YouTube and Uploaded cases (C-682/18 Petersongs v YouTube and C-683/18 Elsevier v Cyando) pending from the German Federal Supreme Court include questions around the communication to the public right, as do C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst v Preussischer Kulturbesitz (Germany, BGH), C-442/19 Brein v News Service Europe (Netherlands, Supreme Court) and C-597/19 Mircom v… [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 7:12 am
In Alice Corporation v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 1:23 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:42 am
Also developing a reading list/canon, which is particularly useful for design where there are a lot of different fields involved/don’t need to jump straight to legal doctrine.Session 1: What is “Design”? [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 7:36 am
Smith ’67 Professor of Law at Duke Law School, where he co-directs the Center for Firearms Law. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:23 am
The second prong of Complete Auto Transit v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 6:59 pm
In the case of Pearson v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 11:47 am
The claim has especially rose in prominence due to the matter of Marshall v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 2:25 pm
Smith Corp., 400 F.3d 1227, 1233 (10th Cir. 2004) (quoting Mitchell v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am
Roberts’s outstanding work drew the attention of White House counsel Fred Fielding, who recruited Roberts to his staff in 1982. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 8:15 am
[5] Fiers v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 4:08 am
Smith, in which the court two years ago struck down an Arkansas law that required the names of both mothers and fathers on birth certificates but not the names of both parents in same-sex marriages as inconsistent with Obergefell v. [read post]
