Search for: "Smith v. State of Ga."
Results 221 - 240
of 552
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2015, 9:48 am
Owens, 274 S.E.2d 484, 485–86 (Ga. 1981); S.B. v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:57 am
<> Senators Introduce Bills to Increase States' Share of Oil and Natural Gas Revenues - U.S. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
’s Office v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:20 am
State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Natural Resources Defense v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 6:46 pm
The 2008 decision in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders clarified that the duty of the directors is to the corporation. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
Nick Smith challenges the United States Department of Agriculture's determination that Smith had converted 2.24 acres of wetland on his property and that he is, consequently, totally ineligible for program benefits. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
<> Case Update: Michigan v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:50 am
In a recent slip-and-fall case, Smith v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:22 pm
The latest case is Viola Coppela v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 1:36 pm
Smith, 943 S.W.2d 414, 420 (Tex. 1997)). [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:50 am
” Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am
It is said that the law cannot keep pace with society, evolving about twenty years slower than the culture, but even the United States Supreme Court has caught on to the uniqueness of the modern “cell phone,” calling the devices “minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone” in a landmark case last year called Riley v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Lamb and The Episcopal Church v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 3:44 am
Requiring an applicant to fill out new I-9 form on tight deadline (Smith v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
The issue was discussed at some length in another pharmacy case, Smith v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
” Sorrell v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
