Search for: "State Court of Clayton County" Results 221 - 240 of 641
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2020, 4:43 am by James Romoser
Clayton County — which held that Title VII bars workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity — to discrimination in schools. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 12:21 pm by Phillips & Associates
Clayton County, Georgia that discrimination “on the basis of sex” includes sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression. [read post]
Clayton County, Ga. four days prior which concluded that discrimination “on the basis of sex” encompasses claims based on gender identity and sexual orientation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Clayton County that sex discrimination includes discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 2:18 pm by Sasha Volokh
(That governs the federal Contract Clause; as noted above, state courts applying their own state constitutional contract clauses are free to take stricter views. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:20 am by Kim Colby
Clayton County, which re-interpreted Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to include sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classes, the court offered reassurance that RFRA, Title VII’s religious exemption and the “ministerial exception” will suffice to protect religious individuals and institutions. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 7:36 am by Erwin Chemerinsky and Howard Gillman
Clayton County, Georgia, which held that employment discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity violates Title VII – but left open the possibility that religious employers may be entitled to exemptions. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:03 pm by Brett Holubeck
Clayton County (Consolidated with Altitude Express v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:20 am by Jill Roamer, J.D. and Katanya Mintz
Last month, the Supreme Court of the United States decided whether or not Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 encompasses discrimination based on an individual’s sexual orientation. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Most of this story is now familiar: After declaring formal and explicit state-imposed segregation unconstitutional, the Court largely insulated from legal challenges a variety of laws and policies that reinforced or perpetuated racial inequality and racial hierarchies—redlining, white flight, prosecutorial discretion, and the list goes on. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm by Josh Blackman
" Roberts separately referred to exemptions from state anti-bias laws for religious employers, and in their private discussions, CNN has learned, justices mulled religious liberty concerns. [read post]