Search for: "State v Gill" Results 221 - 240 of 651
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2010, 3:15 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench) Veolia Water Central Ltd v London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority [2010] EWHC 208 (QB) (09 February 2010) Moore v Hotelplan Ltd (t/a Inghams Travel) & Anor [2010] EWHC 276 (QB) (22 February 2010) Rutherford v Seymour Pierce Ltd [2010] EWHC 375 (QB) (11 February 2010) Law Society of England and Wales v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2010] EWHC 352 (QB) (26 February 2010) High Court (Chancery… [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:35 am by tracey
Supreme Court Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher & Ors [2011] UKSC 41 (27 July 2011) Belmont Park Investments PTY Ltd v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd & Anor [2011] UKSC 38 (27 July 2011) Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40 (27 July 2011) Houldsworth & Anor v Bridge Trustees Ltd & Anor [2011] UKSC 42 (27 July 2011) Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor [2011] UKSC 39 (27 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) The Newspaper Licensing… [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:49 am by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
  At this point petitions for Supreme Court review have been filed in two other DOMA cases – GLAD’s Gill v. [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 5:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The allegations in the pleading and opposition papers similarly fail to allege sufficient facts to state a cause of action under Judiciary Law § 487. 1 Even when viewed in the light most favorable to the Plaintiffs, the statements made by Devine were not deceitful in any manner at all (see Gill, 188 AD3d at 1009). [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 12:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Instead, the court will keep its focus on a quite different case on the issue – the case of Gill v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 8:18 am by Andrew Hamm
United States ex rel. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 9:14 am
  Jimenez will be running, at least for now, in Group 34, an open seat due to the retirement of Judge Gill Freeman.Mr. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 3:07 am by Scott Bomboy
On Tuesday, October 3, the nine Justices will consider Gill v. [read post]