Search for: "State v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 221 - 240
of 928
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2014, 3:03 pm
Rep. 153 (2008), states that “medical opinion that work injury was forty percent of cause satisfied” the 1(7A) standard. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:03 pm
Rep. 153 (2008), states that “medical opinion that work injury was forty percent of cause satisfied” the 1(7A) standard. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:03 pm
Rep. 153 (2008), states that “medical opinion that work injury was forty percent of cause satisfied” the 1(7A) standard. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:03 pm
Rep. 153 (2008), states that “medical opinion that work injury was forty percent of cause satisfied” the 1(7A) standard. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 6:36 am
Reinstating a decision of the state’s Workers’ Compensation Board that had awarded benefits to a medical employee who sustained injuries in a hospital shooting, the New York Court of Appeals, in Timperio v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:03 pm
The regulations further state “[r]egistered nurses who are registered by the appropriate State examining board generally meet the duties requirements for the learned professional exemption. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
New York State Workers' Compensation Bd. , 212 A.D.3d 126, 179 N.Y.S.3d 455 (3d Dept. 2022) [see § 124.02 n. 33], the Board’s decision to remove a medical practitioner from a list of authorized medical providers was found not to be arbitrary. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 11:32 am
Based on the Ridling examination, the State of Oklahoma pressed charges against McCormick. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 1:28 pm
Infant plaintiff’s mother (herein “plaintiff-mother”) is a physician Board Certified in Internal Medicine. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 7:03 am
State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:58 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Byrnie v Town of Cromwell Board of Education, 243 F3d 93 [2001], explained that spoliation sanctions serve three purposes: (1) deterring parties from destroying evidence; (2) placing the risk of an erroneous evaluation of the content of the destroyed evidence on the party responsible for its destruction; and (3) restoring the party harmed by the loss of evidence helpful to its case to where the party would have… [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:19 am
In School Board of Lee County v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 2:00 am
Sending her for an independent medical examination did not necessarily trigger the direct-threat framework (Felix v. [read post]
19 Dec 2024, 1:30 am
Matter of City of Watertown v State of N.Y. [read post]
19 Dec 2024, 1:30 am
Matter of City of Watertown v State of N.Y. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm
Justice Zahra explained that the Board of Law Examiners never investigated plaintiff’s FOIA action and this matter had no impact on the Board’s 2010 decision. [read post]
6 May 2016, 4:00 am
On remand, however, Supreme Court granted Fernandez’s petition to the extent of restoring him, “upon his successful completion of a medical examination, to his position as a bus operator, with full benefits and accrued vacation running from the date of his reinstatement. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
Robert V. [read post]
16 May 2007, 9:56 am
Beezhold's written plan in the chart specifically stated that Mrs. [read post]
