Search for: "State v. Board of Medical Examiners" Results 221 - 240 of 983
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2012, 12:59 am
The Examiner then stated that “the legs 76 of Henriques are capable of being removed, even if it requires a blow torch. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
What a workers’ comp insurance carrier must prove to stop benefits in this situation was examined recently in the matter of Ortiz v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 7:23 am
He was found disabled by both the NYCERS Medical Board and an outside health provider after medical examinations. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:03 pm
The regulations further state “[r]egistered nurses who are registered by the appropriate State examining board generally meet the duties requirements for the learned professional exemption. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
New York State Workers' Compensation Bd. , 212 A.D.3d 126, 179 N.Y.S.3d 455 (3d Dept. 2022) [see § 124.02 n. 33], the Board’s decision to remove a medical practitioner from a list of authorized medical providers was found not to be arbitrary. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 1:28 pm
Infant plaintiff’s mother (herein “plaintiff-mother”) is a physician Board Certified in Internal Medicine. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 11:32 am by John Floyd
  Based on the Ridling examination, the State of Oklahoma pressed charges against McCormick. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Byrnie v Town of Cromwell Board of Education, 243 F3d 93 [2001], explained that spoliation sanctions serve three purposes: (1) deterring parties from destroying evidence; (2) placing the risk of an erroneous evaluation of the content of the destroyed evidence on the party responsible for its destruction; and (3) restoring the party harmed by the loss of evidence helpful to its case to where the party would have… [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 2:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Sending her for an independent medical examination did not necessarily trigger the direct-threat framework (Felix v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm by Madelaine Lane
  Justice Zahra explained that the Board of Law Examiners never investigated plaintiff’s FOIA action and this matter had no impact on the Board’s 2010 decision. [read post]
6 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
On remand, however, Supreme Court granted Fernandez’s petition to the extent of restoring him, “upon his successful completion of a medical examination, to his position as a bus operator, with full benefits and accrued vacation running from the date of his reinstatement. [read post]