Search for: "State v. Cohen" Results 221 - 240 of 2,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Cohen Tauber Spievack & Wagner P.C. v Mehulol  Publs., LLC 2022 NY Slip Op 30401(U) February 1, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 652426/2021 Judge Bluth determined the merits of a case alleging that the attorneys failed in both the Supreme Court case as well as in a Rabbinical court and never obtained “forgiveness” for the client. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant was not discharged for cause, nor did it charge legal fees for any work associated with the motion practice ensuing from the supplemental disclosures (see Decolator, Cohen & DiPrisco v Lysaght, Lysaght & Kramer, 304 AD2d 86, 91 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:58 am by Eric Goldman
Google * Facebook Defeats Lawsuit Over Material Support for Terrorists–Cohen v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 4:58 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Andrew Cohen discusses Justice Sotomayor’s dissent from the denial of certiorari in Woodward v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:20 am by Matt C. Bailey
LEXIS 79585, at 31-32.Of course, such analysis runs counter to the Second District’s recent decision in Cohen v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 10:00 am
“Of all the places you’d think they would have state-of-the-art fire protections, you think it would be there. [read post]
11 May 2018, 8:51 am by Steven Cohen
  The court granted the motion Facts:  This case (Georges v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 10:46 am by Eric Goldman
Google * Facebook Defeats Lawsuit Over Material Support for Terrorists–Cohen v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:39 am by Danielle Citron
  Professor Kaminski is a Research Scholar at Yale as well as the Executive Director of the Yale Information Society Project–we have been lucky to feature her insights on United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 7:15 am by ASAD KHAN
Sales LJ was unconvinced that the criteria set out in Ladd v Marshall [1954] EWCA Civ 1 – intended to reflect the balance of justice in relation to applications to admit fresh evidence – had not been satisfied and KV was unable to demonstrate that evidence such as Dr Cohen’s report could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence for use earlier. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:30 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Monday morning read: Justice Breyer’s Legacy-Defining Decision (Adam Cohen, The Atlantic) How the Anti-Abortion Movement Used the Progressive Playbook to Chip Away at Roe v. [read post]