Search for: "State v. Easter"
Results 221 - 240
of 337
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2012, 2:33 am
It’s the last week of the Easter Term. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:59 am
Now with the Easter weekend now in her midst and sadly, given her lack of planning, no Easter eggs to dye or Easter basket bounty to gorge upon, she has found some breathing space to return with some brightly colored eggs of US IP news of the past few weeks. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 12:11 pm
It is the work of a sitting United States Senator. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 7:53 am
(Eugene Volokh) So holds Stand Up For America Now v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:20 am
Supreme Court decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:13 am
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
The adjudication states: “The article under complaint was a feature on Gary Dobson and David Norris, who had recently been convicted of the murder of Stephen Lawrence. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Luminant Generating Co., LLC, v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 10:34 am
In Guzzo v Cristofano, 2011 WL 6934108 (S.D.N.Y.) [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
Max Warren Pink n Yellow v Black and Yellow Wiz Khalifa Pennsylvania easter district// < ! [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:35 pm
* An amended Capitol v MP3Tunes opinion explains why 17 USC 512 applies to state copyright claims (see pages 14-17). [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
529/07 Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH, also known as the "Easter bunnies' case", which was a reference for a preliminary ruling from Austria on the question of how to establish bad faith in trade mark invalidity proceedings. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:00 pm
In its 1990 opinion Employment Division v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:56 am
As the court stated in the 1983 case of Ponte v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
The Easter judicial term began with a blaze of publicity and no small amount of controversy. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
The Easter judicial term began with a blaze of publicity and no small amount of controversy. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 8:22 am
Around Easter, in 2008, Quesada, K. [read post]
