Search for: "State v. Frost" Results 221 - 240 of 383
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2015, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
(d)        The judge was wrong to reject MGN’s submission that damages for breach of privacy are compensation for injured feelings and are not intended to mark wrongdoing, such damages being vindicatory in effect and therefore contrary to the principles stated inLumba v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am by INFORRM
The defendant relied on the judgment of Lord Dyson in the Supreme Court case of R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2012] 1 AC 245 [101]), in which he disapproved the concept of “vindicatory damages”. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
Hope you’ve eaten your Frosted Flakes; this is going to be a long one. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 2:20 am by Amy Howe
”   [Disclosure:  Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioners in State Water Contractors v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am by John Elwood
Frost, 14-95 (second relist), questions whether a limitation on a closing argument in a criminal case is a structural error under Herring v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
Frost, 14-95, involves limitations on closing arguments in criminal cases. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 2:32 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Frost Court Rules That Instant Message Conversation Modified the Terms of a Written Contract — CX Digital v. [read post]