Search for: "State v. Humbles" Results 221 - 240 of 496
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2014, 12:21 am by Jeff Gamso
Sadly, government did so in this case.In 2011, he was the judge in Islamic Shura Council of Southern California v. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 11:00 pm by Kingsley Egbuonu
 The Court of Appeal in the case of Arewa Textiles Plc & Others v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:32 am by Guest Blogger
 The book then chronicles the very different state of the law today. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallTwenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 2:00 pm
In my humble opinion, the case is procedurally too premature for constitutional review by the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 2:28 pm by Morris Turek
  Unfortunately, it appears that Carefusion has not recently reviewed the Anti-Dilution Act set forth in 15 U.S.C. 1125(c), which states that a “famous” mark is one that is “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark’s owner. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:26 pm
Given the state of the art, it was obvious to anyone who needed a stent of this nature that he would have to use taxol. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
American Home Products Corp., 595 S.E.2d 493, 496 (S.C. 2004).Texas: Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. [read post]