Search for: "State v. Koch"
Results 221 - 240
of 327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2012, 10:52 am
Given how important our vote is for the most important office in the world, these communications raise huge issues and questions of what is allowed under the law.In 2010 the Supreme Court of the United States made a ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:35 am
So Roe v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:03 am
But, doubtful readers, rest assured that Terry v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 7:10 am
U.S. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 4:30 am
Back in 2012, it was crystal clear (to me anyway) that Justice Kagan should recuse herself from the important Obama Care case NFIB v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:10 pm
[who] won the last punitive damages case before the Supremes, representing State Farm in 2003's Campbell v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
In our view, Local Law No. 3 was consistent with the Village’s comprehensive plan and was “calculated to benefit the community as a whole as opposed to benefitting individuals or a group of individuals” (Asian Ams. for Equality v Koch, 72 NY2d at 131; see Daniels v Van Voris, 241 AD2d 796, 798 [1997]). [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
In our view, Local Law No. 3 was consistent with the Village’s comprehensive plan and was “calculated to benefit the community as a whole as opposed to benefitting individuals or a group of individuals” (Asian Ams. for Equality v Koch, 72 NY2d at 131; see Daniels v Van Voris, 241 AD2d 796, 798 [1997]). [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 3:03 pm
In Matters of Rey v Spinetta, Even if the Family Court had jurisdiction under Domestic Relations Law § 76-a (1) (a), "pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 76-f, a court of this state which has jurisdiction may decline to exercise it if it finds that New York is an inconvenient forum and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum". [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:39 pm
3) A federal wealth tax could well be unconstitutional as a "direct tax" that is not apportioned by state, although it is not clear whether current Supreme Court doctrine is as restrictive of such direct taxes as the old jurisprudence per Pollock v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 10:49 am
Koch (1998), 81 Ohio St. 3d 577, 578. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Koch did not make gifts of his company stock directly to the Stand Together nonprofit network. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:50 am
We only have to look back to Bush v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 3:32 pm
The Delaware case is Julia Haart v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 2:13 am
Natural Resources Defense Council et al. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:22 pm
Koch's opinion that the Miranda decision was useless and unnecessary. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 8:38 pm
Koch. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:30 am
Noting that a subpoena ad testificandum will be quashed only where the futility of the process to uncover anything legitimate is inevitable or obvious or where the information sought is utterly irrelevant to any proper inquiry, the Appellate Division, citing Kapon v Koch, 23 NY3d at page 39, said that the party moving to quash bears "the burden of establishing that the subpoena should be [quashed] under such circumstances. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:30 am
Noting that a subpoena ad testificandum will be quashed only where the futility of the process to uncover anything legitimate is inevitable or obvious or where the information sought is utterly irrelevant to any proper inquiry, the Appellate Division, citing Kapon v Koch, 23 NY3d at page 39, said that the party moving to quash bears "the burden of establishing that the subpoena should be [quashed] under such circumstances. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 7:31 pm
But at least in the United States, our rights are not so much stolen from us as they are simply lost by us. [read post]
